Today’s story is “The Riddle of the Runaway Sphinx.” Written
by Michael T. Gilbert and drawn by Stephen DeStefano.
David Gerstein in his landmark essay on Disney Comics, “Disney Comics Back to Long Ago” mentioned this tale as a memorable entity. I won’t dispute his judgment. It is certainly a striking story. But first some background musings.
One striking aspect of these early headliner stories is the
exotic locales. First, Venice, and now Egypt has made Mickey into the mouse
version of Tintin. It is not a far departure from the Gottfredson strip. Mickey
in his serials travelled to the deepest jungles of Africa, ventured into
fictional Middle Eastern principalities, and sailed across the seven seas. The
Adventures line clearly wanted to make sure readers understood that life was
thrilling for Mickey. So why does this
raise a nagging question?
The question of finances regarding a funny animal comic
might be digging deeper than the artist/writer intended. Obviously, the first
missile would be: It is a comic meant for
children. Quit seeing something in nothing. Sometimes the curtains are just
blue. As a former English major, it might be surprising to hear that I, at
times, find the need to overanalyze to be a flaw of the discipline. Yet, it is
worth asking: do Mickey’s finance matter to the story? And, by extension, his
character and the understanding of said persona.
As for this story; no, finances don’t matter. Mickey and
Goofy are in Egypt. Period. None of the postcards are available for purchase so
a large bank account can’t buy nonexistence. Goofy has no problem buying the
barrels of oil so some level of finance is bankrolling the trip. The story
doesn’t need explanation to work.
The answer regarding his finance is complicated by Mickey’s Meta
existence. We know Mickey as the leader of a corporation, no, a conglomerate.
The term, the Mouse, is regularly used as a euphemism for Disney itself. He is
known for good cheer, expensive tickets, and copious merchandise (of which I
have purchased much). The concept that Mickey could be middle class or even poor seems artificial. Yes, the comic
and actor Mickey are separate from the park Mickey (though there has been
overlap from his birth) but the Mickey that loses everything in the stock
market (an event in the 1930s) and has to become a plumber’s helper seems hard
to swallow in 2020. The Three Musketeers
movie has Mickey, Donald, and Goofy as poor janitors but it is a light satire
piece, clearly inspired by the concept of the trio as paid actors. We know each
Mickey exists in their own universe but we also consume all the Mickeys.
Mickey is universally described as a cheerful, determined,
underdog. Gottfredson viewed him, “as a Chaplin Mouse against the world.”
Financial security might cut away at that image. Unlike Scrooge McDuck, whose
personality of being smarter than the smarties, makes up for his Croesus wealth,
Mickey’s persona is more personable. Like Walt, he started as a farm boy who
made it big in the big city yet kept his homespun values. Does Mickey having
money change his basic appeal? I don’t think so. Mickey’s best stories, be them
animated or comic, come from the tales that emphasize his best qualities of
goodness and perseverance.
However, it is not like mentioning of finances is necessary for
an adventure. The Sacred Jewel has
Mickey borrowing a blimp from Captain Doberman on the basis of friendship.
Plenty of adventures have Mickey exploring on behalf of a professor.
Ultimately, it might be window dressing more than anything. But it is true that
The Plumber’s Helper and The Monarch of Medioka have their plots launched
by Mickey’s financial situation. In the long run, it is more imperative to have
a great story but conversation is always entertaining.
Phew. I spent plenty of words discussing a relatively innocuous
question. Onto the review!
The story starts with a panel in the shape of a postcard.
Clever idea. Apparently, Minnie Mouse lives at 271 Sunshine Lane in Mouseton.
(Time to send prank magazines!) Mickey and Goofy stop at a stand so Mickey can fulfill
his promise to Minnie by buying a postcard. As he is doing that, Mickey asks
Goofy to fill up the gas tank. The souvenir merchant charges $100 for a postcard
due to supply and demand but explains Mr. Pettigreed charges much more. (You
know with a last name like Pettigreed, I think a person has to become a
villain. What chance do they have to be a hero?)
As Mickey ponders why a postcard tycoon needs machinery parts, Goofy proudly shows off the multiple barrels of oil he purchased. (Mickey, you have no one but yourself to blame. You know how Goofy operates). Mickey grumbles that he couldn’t buy a postcard and as they head over the sand dune, they come to the title page and the realization that someone stole the Sphinx! (Napoleon in legend only shot off the nose!)
By the way, the title page with the missing Sphinx is great
art. The story is full of awesome artistry.
Mickey and Goofy drive up to see what it is happening only to run into a boastful detective whose design is Goofy with a mustache. In the grand Disney comics traditions of useless but egotistical law enforcement, the Great Inspector Ghufu can barely keep track of his magnifying glass much less find one of the world’s most famous landmarks. Mickey knowing this showcases his trademark determination to solve the crime.
Driving across the desert, they come across tire tracks and
follow them to a suspicious glass bubble where our villains await: Pig-faced
Pettigreed and the two-headed Doctor Doublecross (I love names in Disney
comics). It turns out Pettigreed hired the mad doctor(s?) to steal the Sphinx.
Why? Because apparently Pettigreed is pulling a Scrooge McDuck plot from “Lost
Beneath the Sea” and collecting famous monuments to stash on a secret island to
create his own national monument park.
Now I probably don’t need to explain how this wouldn’t work. Ignoring the obvious aspect that swiping such monuments as the Sphinx, the Statue of Library, the Eiffel Tower etc are nearly impossible but how will a tourist park work? I can buy the concept if he were to keep the island private but his mural displays a typical family enjoying the sites. He clearly wants to make a profit. His dialogue of “Early on, I learned that monopolies make the most money so I decided to create my own monopoly” suggests he isn’t in this for the art but the desire for cold hard cash. Hey, I am a big capitalist but I also know that stealing and displaying national monuments is not a sound business plan. Eventually, the powers to be are going to arrest him. On one level, I love his zany the plan is. It is Silver Age nonsense which is always enjoyable but when you play it straight, it tends to raise questions. I think it probably would have been better if Pettigreed was cut and Dr. Doublecross just stole the Sphinx for the science. But hey if you are going to be a villain, be memorable.
Speaking of Dr. Doublecross, the Disney comics editors actually
try to keep their identity a mystery but any reader of Gottfredson work know
the two-handed monster is Professor Doublex and Professor Ecks from the classic
“Blaggard Castle.” I do appreciate the aura summoned by the editors in their
attempt at playing naïve. The fused together duo are the best part of the
story. Both heads have egos larger than the Sphinx and their bickering is just
great especially as Pettigreed tries to halt it in vain.
Their route to fisticuffs runs into a roadblock as Mickey and Goofy crash the party in an epic entrance. I can only imagine how awesome this scene would be in animation. Dr. Doublecross reacts quickly enough hitting the start button that reveals the glass bubble is the control hub up top of the Sphinx which now has off road capabilities.
Mickey and Goofy retreat to the jeep as Mickey takes the wheel (Steamboat Willie!) with the mobile Sphinx hot on their tail. That is what happens when you give the wrong answer to the Sphinx’s riddle.
Mickey realizes that Goofy’s extravagant purchase might actually prove useful and orders Goofy to reenact the Amoco Cadiz oil spill. As per the Law of Comedic Timing, the mechanical legs prove fruitlessly against the slippery power of black gold and comes to a crashing halt.
The authorities arrive to wrap up everything and, of course,
Inspector Ghufu proves to be an Egyptian Casey and takes all the credit. Mickey
is offered anything as a reward and settles for a postcard which he sends to
Minnie and the comic ends on a sweet note with the recipient receiving the
item.
Gerstein was right. It is one of the more memorable tales in the line all thanks to the artwork and the writing working well together. Really, there are only two quibbles. 1. The length is much too short. 12 pages is not enough. Give the story about 10 more pages with more room to breathe and I think the story doesn’t feel as rushed; it basically goes missing sphinx, villain exposition, chase, and resolution in the space of 5-6 pages. The Inspector is basically wasted. He appears once at the beginning and then just disappears until the end. His giant ego while hilarious doesn’t add anything. He doesn’t hinder the investigation or bring anything to the table. 2. Pettigreed is superfluous and as previously explained his plan makes little logical sense. Dr. Doublecross drives the action (pun intended) figuratively and literally. The doctors in Blaggard Castle did all kinds of crazy experiments just for the science. Why not just have them steal the Sphinx because they can/wanted to drive a new invention? Yeah, Pettigreed buying up all the postcards gets the ball rolling but you can still have another motivation to lure Mickey and Goofy to the missing sphinx.
Still, it is a fun story. Final rating: 1 ¾ Ears Up!
Next Up: An arch-villain seemingly triumphs in Mouseton!
A thing that I had thinking for years is what the characters of Mice Universe do for a living - the only that seem to have a job are Horace Horsecollar and the policemen (contrast with Duck Universe, where we have an idea of their jobs or sources of income, even if - as in Donald Duck - irregular). My suspicion is that Mickey has some kind of contract as a "consultant" of the Police Department.
ReplyDeleteMiguel,
ReplyDeleteI have thought the same thing. In the Gottfredson serials, Mickey's employment, or lack of, was often a plot point. It seems like with Mickey, it is not much the basis for stories as with Donald. Then again, Donald usually works for Scrooge, whose entire character revolves around wealth.
I liked your idea of a consultant contract. It makes perfect sense. Or maybe Walt left Mickey a trust fund. ;)
I mean, there's a significant body of work behind Mickey being a famous actor, who, one would assume, thus does his detective work as more of a hobby. There's also evidence that he's a journalist, which I like less because it's just as meta as the "actor" idea (the implication usually being that Mickey is behind e.g. Topolino itself, depending on the country) but more boringly generic about it.
ReplyDeleteInteresting.
DeleteI prefer the detective as a consultant type deal. But actor could be cool as well. There is so much contrasting data out there.